Accelerate Lynxeye with AI

A proposal for Lynxeye · May 2026

"Accelerate Lynxeye with AI"

Accelerate Lynxeye with AI is about growing client impact by building on company AI infrastructure. HQ and Eraneos create the secure foundation. This work helps Lynxeye turn that foundation into smoother daily use, stronger client delivery, sharper pitches, and reusable practice.

Value matrix

Where the work creates value.

This is the agreement model: the visible table keeps the conversation simple, and the row details open the discussion points behind each level of work.

Level Setup & daily use Client projects Client pitches
EmployeesIndividual fluency and confidence. Setup & daily useSkills, tools, access, confidence Client projectsBetter prepared, faster contribution Client pitchesMore useful pitch input earlier
TeamsShared working rhythm. Setup & daily useShared setup and working rhythm Client projectsWorkflows tested in real projects Client pitchesBetter pitch flow and output quality
LynxeyeCompany-owned capability. Setup & daily useCompany-owned adoption path Client projectsPlaybooks and reusable methods Client pitchesValue evidence and scale choices

The overview keeps the model simple: people build fluency, teams prove workflows, and Lynxeye turns the learning into reusable capability.

Back of the envelope

Potential business value for Lynxeye.

This is not proof. It is a simple way to discuss the size of the opportunity: capacity captured, pitch speed, win probability, hiring pressure, and an editable investment frame. Scope & Setup calibrates the assumptions. Prove In Work replaces them with Lynxeye evidence.

Lynxeye baseline (SEK)

70
Assumption: Lynxeye headcount in scope for the model. Default: 70 from the brief. Range: 20 to 150, so the same logic can be tested on a smaller pilot or wider firm scale. Caveat: Phase 1 should confirm the real team count for Phase 2.
1,500
Assumption: annual billable hours per consultant. Default: 1,500, a directional premium consultancy starting point. Range: 1,000 to 2,000 for lower and higher utilization years. Caveat: Lynxeye-specific utilization should be confirmed before Phase 2.
3,000
Assumption: blended billing rate across seniority levels. Default: 3,000 SEK/hr. Range: 1,500 to 5,000 SEK/hr because rates vary by role and engagement type. Caveat: this creates gross equivalent value, not net profit.

Improvement levers

25%
Assumption: reduction in project delivery time from better AI orchestration. Default: 25%, so a 12-week project becomes roughly 9 weeks. Range: 0 to 50%, from no lift to an ambitious upside case. Caveat: this must be proven by Lynxeye workflow evidence.
25%
Assumption: reduction in time from opportunity or RFP to proposal-ready. Default: 25%, so a 4-week pitch becomes roughly 3 weeks. Formula effect: baseline pitches divided by the compressed cycle. Caveat: baseline pitch volume is a placeholder.
15%
Assumption: relative improvement on qualified pitch wins from better preparation and faster turnaround. Default: 15%. Range: 0 to 40%. Caveat: this affects expected additional wins only, no revenue value is assigned because deal size is not in the model.
60%
Assumption: share of freed time that becomes real value instead of work creep. Default: 60%. Formula effect: raw freed capacity is multiplied by this rate. Caveat: Phase 1 defines how this will be measured, and Phase 2 tests it in real work.
Tooling cost note. There will of course be a cost per employee for AI solutions and tools. This simulator keeps that outside the model until the exact stack, licenses, and scope are clear.
Advanced assumptions
Assumption: qualified pitch volume before compression. Default: 12, roughly one qualified pitch per month. Formula effect: used in pitch-equivalent capacity and expected wins. Caveat: Henrik should replace this with Lynxeye's actual volume.
Assumption: current win rate on qualified pitches. Default: 35%. Formula effect: baseline pitches x baseline win rate x win-rate improvement. Caveat: this is not Lynxeye-confirmed, and revenue impact is intentionally excluded.
Assumption: working weeks used for human interpretation. Default: 46. Formula effect: captured capacity divided by employees and working weeks. Caveat: this is only for readability, not the core commercial value calculation.
Assumption: uncertainty band around captured capacity and gross value. Default: 15%. Formula effect: captured capacity is shown as plus or minus this band. Caveat: exact internal math is rounded only for display.

Output · directional Phase 2 potential at current settings

Main signal

Captured capacity

Formula: raw freed capacity x freed-time capture rate, shown with the uncertainty band. Interpretation: the part of the upside that survives work creep. Caveat: this is the directional number Phase 2 is meant to test with evidence.

13,400 to 18,100 hours

For Lynxeye at 70 people, roughly 15,750 hours survives work creep before the uncertainty band.

Gross capacity value

Formula: captured capacity range x blended billing rate. Interpretation: gross equivalent capacity value if the time becomes useful client work. Caveat: this is not net profit, and it excludes margin, pricing, demand, and change cost.

40.2 to 54.3M SEK

If captured as billable work at 3,000 SEK/hr, this is the gross directional Phase 2 upside.

Pitch-equivalent capacity

Formula: baseline pitches divided by (1 minus pitch compression), then minus baseline pitches. Interpretation: extra pitch-equivalent capacity from shorter cycles. Caveat: this is capacity, not a sales forecast.

+4

At 12 baseline pitches and 25% compression, the same pitch capacity can handle roughly +4 more pitch-equivalents per year.

Hours returned / consultant / week

Formula: captured capacity divided by employees and working weeks. Interpretation: what the model feels like in the week. Caveat: this depends on leaders protecting the recovered time from low-value work.

4.9 hours

Roughly 0.7 workdays per consultant per week.

Model context

Raw freed capacity

Formula: employees x billable hours x project delivery compression. Interpretation: gross time opportunity before capture. Caveat: raw freed time is not value until the organization captures it.

26,250 hours

Gross time opportunity before capture rate is applied.

Expected additional qualified wins

Formula: baseline pitches x baseline win rate x win-rate improvement. Interpretation: incremental qualified wins before any deal-size value. Caveat: this is directional only, no revenue value is assigned.

+0.6

At 12 qualified pitches per year and a 35% baseline win rate.

AI tool costs

Interpretation: there will be a cost per employee for AI solutions and tools. Caveat: the exact tool stack, licensing model, and enterprise terms should be handled after scope alignment, not inside this directional upside model.

Separate implementation cost.

Tooling is real, but it is not a slider in this model.

Captured vs. absorbed time

Formula: captured time equals raw freed capacity x capture rate, absorbed time is the remainder. Interpretation: the work-creep risk made visible. Caveat: the split is a hypothesis until measured.

60% captured / 40% absorbed

Phase 1 defines the split. Phase 2 is where it can move in the right direction.

Where the time can go

Interpretation: recovered effort can move into higher-value work and less blank-page production burden. Caveat: this is not measured yet, and the pattern depends on leadership rhythm.

Client prep, synthesis, senior review, learning, proposal depth.

A better use of the week, not just a shorter week.

Every 1 percentage point increase in captured time is worth roughly 263 hours / 788k SEK gross capacity at current settings.

Investment frame

Compare the directional value with an editable investment frame.

This is a value conversation tool, not a guarantee. Add a working investment frame to see what share of the projected value would need to be captured.

Use this as an editable comparison frame, not a quoted fixed price. The simulator keeps gross directional value separate from any later offer decision.
Net value after investment Waiting for investment
Value multiple Waiting for investment
Payback signal Waiting for investment

Add an investment frame to compare it with the directional value range.

What this means

For clients

Directional interpretation. The simulator does not prove client outcomes. It shows where freed capacity could improve the client experience if Lynxeye captures it deliberately.

Faster iteration, better-prepared teams, and more senior attention on judgment, implications, and quality.

For employees

Directional interpretation. Employee value depends on whether leadership protects the recovered time from being absorbed by more low-value work.

Fewer blank-page starts, less production drag, clearer playbooks, and more time for thinking and craft.

For partners

Directional interpretation. The partner value is not that senior people disappear from the work. It is that their judgment is used at better moments.

Less senior bottleneck, better delegation, reusable methods, and clearer quality control across teams.

For Lynxeye

Directional interpretation. The firm-level value only appears when isolated AI use becomes shared operating capability.

Compounding capability instead of isolated tool use: workflows, playbooks, and judgment that improve with reuse.

Directional Phase 2 potential. These numbers are directional, not promises. The purpose is to frame what becomes possible once the pilot creates evidence.

Scope before proof

Before the upside can be claimed, Lynxeye needs a clean baseline and a focused pilot design.

Phase 1 defines what to measure, which teams to involve, which work to use, and what the central AI setup makes possible.

Phase 2 then tests the value in real client work, not in a theoretical business case.

Hiring pressure

Could capability lower the next hiring need?

This is not a headcount reduction argument. It is a hiring pressure argument: hire where human judgment is needed, and let playbooks absorb repeatable production load.

Pricing stays [TBD]
3 hires
Assumption: the number of hires Lynxeye might consider if the only answer is more headcount. Default: 3, matching the finance-team pressure mentioned in the brief. Range: 1 to 6, so the pressure can be tested without changing the rest of the model.

Capability support level

50%

Scenario

Old answer: hire 3. Capability answer: hire about 2, while playbooks absorb the pressure of roughly 1 role.

Hiring run-rate not immediately added 1.2 to 1.5M SEK / year
AI tool costs Handled separately

Project Accelerate pricing stays [TBD], and this model always leaves at least one real hire in place.

Old hiring answer 3.6 to 4.5M SEK / year

Fully loaded annual run-rate before recruiting delay.

Capability answer About 2 hires still needed

Plus [TBD] Phase 1 setup, Phase 2 engagement, and per-employee AI tool costs outside the hiring-cost model.

Time to first lift 8-12 weeks

Hiring can still be right. Capability work can start easing pressure before a 6-12 month hiring cycle has fully landed.

What we do not know yet: actual adoption rate, true time savings per workflow, and how much repeatable load playbooks can absorb. Phase 1 defines how to test those numbers. Phase 2 turns them into evidence.

Where these numbers come from

Source status: directional references for the draft model. Henrik should confirm which sources to cite before external sharing.

Productivity potential: McKinsey, "The Economic Potential of Generative AI".

Task-level consulting evidence: HBS AI Institute, "Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier".

Adoption and value capture: BCG on value creation and destruction with GenAI, BCG on capability expansion, and McKinsey on rewiring to capture value.

Hiring cost logic: Skatteverket employer contributions, used only to support fully loaded Swedish employer-cost logic.

Lynxeye-specific: conversations with Lynxeye, May 2026. Defaults are deliberately directional and should be calibrated in Phase 1.

Direction, not promise. The model frames the upside Phase 2 could help Lynxeye investigate and qualify. It does not claim that Phase 1 delivers these numbers by itself.