A proposal for Lynxeye · May 2026
"Accelerate Lynxeye with AI"
Accelerate Lynxeye with AI is about growing client impact by building on company AI infrastructure. HQ and Eraneos create the secure foundation. This work helps Lynxeye turn that foundation into smoother daily use, stronger client delivery, sharper pitches, and reusable practice.
Value matrix
Where the work creates value.
This is the agreement model: the visible table keeps the conversation simple, and the row details open the discussion points behind each level of work.
| Level | Setup & daily use | Client projects | Client pitches |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmployeesIndividual fluency and confidence. | Setup & daily useSkills, tools, access, confidence | Client projectsBetter prepared, faster contribution | Client pitchesMore useful pitch input earlier |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| TeamsShared working rhythm. | Setup & daily useShared setup and working rhythm | Client projectsWorkflows tested in real projects | Client pitchesBetter pitch flow and output quality |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| LynxeyeCompany-owned capability. | Setup & daily useCompany-owned adoption path | Client projectsPlaybooks and reusable methods | Client pitchesValue evidence and scale choices |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
The overview keeps the model simple: people build fluency, teams prove workflows, and Lynxeye turns the learning into reusable capability.
| Level | Setup & daily use | Client projects | Client pitches |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmployeesWhat each person needs to start well. | Setup & daily useRemove personal friction | Client projectsFind useful work moments | Client pitchesMap pitch contribution |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| TeamsWhat the pilot should test together. | Setup & daily useUnderstand current practice | Client projectsSelect 3 to 5 use cases | Client pitchesSelect pitch contexts |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| LynxeyeWhat leadership needs to agree. | Setup & daily useSet the operating boundaries | Client projectsDefine pilot scope | Client pitchesDefine value evidence |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
Scope & Setup is where the work becomes concrete enough to agree: use cases, tools, people, evidence, boundaries, and what should be built first.
| Level | Setup & daily use | Client projects | Client pitches |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmployeesPractice in the workday. | Setup & daily useHands-on setup and skills | Client projectsCoach real tasks | Client pitchesSupport better first drafts |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| TeamsLive workflows and prototypes. | Setup & daily useBuild shared routines | Client projectsRun workflows and prototypes | Client pitchesImprove pitch flow |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| LynxeyeOutputs the company can reuse. | Setup & daily useDocument wider adoption | Client projectsCapture playbooks and use cases | Client pitchesPackage scale decision |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
The Project Phase is where the discussion points become working outputs: coached use, prototypes, playbooks, use-case evidence, and a clear next decision.
| Level | Setup & daily use | Client projects | Client pitches |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmployeesConfidence, safety, and review. | Setup & daily useMake approved use practical | Client projectsKeep human review visible | Client pitchesProtect tone and quality |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| TeamsShared learning without blame. | Setup & daily useRun a team learning rhythm | Client projectsBuild QA into workflows | Client pitchesImprove patterns over time |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
| LynxeyeTrusted company capability. | Setup & daily useGovern the operating system | Client projectsMaintain reusable methods | Client pitchesFeed evidence back into growth |
| Discussion points | Setup & daily use
|
Client projects
|
Client pitches
|
Adoption, Security & Quality makes the work safe enough to repeat and strong enough for Lynxeye's premium standard.
Back of the envelope
Potential business value for Lynxeye.
This is not proof. It is a simple way to discuss the size of the opportunity: capacity captured, pitch speed, win probability, hiring pressure, and an editable investment frame. Scope & Setup calibrates the assumptions. Prove In Work replaces them with Lynxeye evidence.
Lynxeye baseline (SEK)
Improvement levers
Advanced assumptions
Output · directional Phase 2 potential at current settings
Main signal
Captured capacity
Formula: raw freed capacity x freed-time capture rate, shown with the uncertainty band. Interpretation: the part of the upside that survives work creep. Caveat: this is the directional number Phase 2 is meant to test with evidence.13,400 to 18,100 hours
For Lynxeye at 70 people, roughly 15,750 hours survives work creep before the uncertainty band.
Gross capacity value
Formula: captured capacity range x blended billing rate. Interpretation: gross equivalent capacity value if the time becomes useful client work. Caveat: this is not net profit, and it excludes margin, pricing, demand, and change cost.40.2 to 54.3M SEK
If captured as billable work at 3,000 SEK/hr, this is the gross directional Phase 2 upside.
Pitch-equivalent capacity
Formula: baseline pitches divided by (1 minus pitch compression), then minus baseline pitches. Interpretation: extra pitch-equivalent capacity from shorter cycles. Caveat: this is capacity, not a sales forecast.+4
At 12 baseline pitches and 25% compression, the same pitch capacity can handle roughly +4 more pitch-equivalents per year.
Hours returned / consultant / week
Formula: captured capacity divided by employees and working weeks. Interpretation: what the model feels like in the week. Caveat: this depends on leaders protecting the recovered time from low-value work.4.9 hours
Roughly 0.7 workdays per consultant per week.
Model context
Raw freed capacity
Formula: employees x billable hours x project delivery compression. Interpretation: gross time opportunity before capture. Caveat: raw freed time is not value until the organization captures it.26,250 hours
Gross time opportunity before capture rate is applied.
Expected additional qualified wins
Formula: baseline pitches x baseline win rate x win-rate improvement. Interpretation: incremental qualified wins before any deal-size value. Caveat: this is directional only, no revenue value is assigned.+0.6
At 12 qualified pitches per year and a 35% baseline win rate.
AI tool costs
Interpretation: there will be a cost per employee for AI solutions and tools. Caveat: the exact tool stack, licensing model, and enterprise terms should be handled after scope alignment, not inside this directional upside model.Separate implementation cost.
Tooling is real, but it is not a slider in this model.
Captured vs. absorbed time
Formula: captured time equals raw freed capacity x capture rate, absorbed time is the remainder. Interpretation: the work-creep risk made visible. Caveat: the split is a hypothesis until measured.60% captured / 40% absorbed
Phase 1 defines the split. Phase 2 is where it can move in the right direction.
Where the time can go
Interpretation: recovered effort can move into higher-value work and less blank-page production burden. Caveat: this is not measured yet, and the pattern depends on leadership rhythm.Client prep, synthesis, senior review, learning, proposal depth.
A better use of the week, not just a shorter week.
Investment frame
Compare the directional value with an editable investment frame.
This is a value conversation tool, not a guarantee. Add a working investment frame to see what share of the projected value would need to be captured.
Add an investment frame to compare it with the directional value range.
What this means
For clients
Faster iteration, better-prepared teams, and more senior attention on judgment, implications, and quality.
For employees
Fewer blank-page starts, less production drag, clearer playbooks, and more time for thinking and craft.
For partners
Less senior bottleneck, better delegation, reusable methods, and clearer quality control across teams.
For Lynxeye
Compounding capability instead of isolated tool use: workflows, playbooks, and judgment that improve with reuse.
Directional Phase 2 potential. These numbers are directional, not promises. The purpose is to frame what becomes possible once the pilot creates evidence.
Scope before proof
Before the upside can be claimed, Lynxeye needs a clean baseline and a focused pilot design.
Phase 1 defines what to measure, which teams to involve, which work to use, and what the central AI setup makes possible.
Phase 2 then tests the value in real client work, not in a theoretical business case.
Could capability lower the next hiring need?
This is not a headcount reduction argument. It is a hiring pressure argument: hire where human judgment is needed, and let playbooks absorb repeatable production load.
Capability support level
50%Scenario
Old answer: hire 3. Capability answer: hire about 2, while playbooks absorb the pressure of roughly 1 role.
Project Accelerate pricing stays [TBD], and this model always leaves at least one real hire in place.
Fully loaded annual run-rate before recruiting delay.
Plus [TBD] Phase 1 setup, Phase 2 engagement, and per-employee AI tool costs outside the hiring-cost model.
Hiring can still be right. Capability work can start easing pressure before a 6-12 month hiring cycle has fully landed.
What we do not know yet: actual adoption rate, true time savings per workflow, and how much repeatable load playbooks can absorb. Phase 1 defines how to test those numbers. Phase 2 turns them into evidence.
Where these numbers come from
Source status: directional references for the draft model. Henrik should confirm which sources to cite before external sharing.
Productivity potential: McKinsey, "The Economic Potential of Generative AI".
Task-level consulting evidence: HBS AI Institute, "Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier".
Adoption and value capture: BCG on value creation and destruction with GenAI, BCG on capability expansion, and McKinsey on rewiring to capture value.
Hiring cost logic: Skatteverket employer contributions, used only to support fully loaded Swedish employer-cost logic.
Lynxeye-specific: conversations with Lynxeye, May 2026. Defaults are deliberately directional and should be calibrated in Phase 1.
Direction, not promise. The model frames the upside Phase 2 could help Lynxeye investigate and qualify. It does not claim that Phase 1 delivers these numbers by itself.